Summary of WGC Efforts

Although in some ways this group was well-focused, having the Elephant's Trunk Coronal Hole as its subject, in fact most of the members of the group were also involved in the other groups so it did not come together as a whole very often. Instead, having established aims and areas which needed to be worked on, we split into sub-groups for discussion and work, in between attending meetings of the other groups - all very confusing! However, I think it worked out well in that we made considerable progress towards achieving our aims.

Here is a list of people that are involved in the work of this group (not necessarily original members):
David Alexander Yohkoh
Andy Breen EISCAT IPS
Barbara Bromage CDS
John Clegg CDS/modelling
Giulio Del Zanna CDS
Craig DeForest MDI
Dana Dobrzycka UVCS
Gopal Gopalswami Nobeyama
Don Hassler SUMER
Todd Hoeksema MDI/modelling
Alan Lazarus WIND
Jon Linker modelling
Barbara Thompson EIT
Harry Warren SUMER
Zoran Mikic modelling
Xue Pu Zhao MDI/modelling
John Steinberg WIND

I apologise if I have missed anyone out - please tell me if I have !
( Arik Posner and George Ho ?)

On the first day some specific aims and areas requiring work were identified. These were:

1. Relating Nobeyama oservations to CDS data. This work progressed well, concluding that the bright areas seen by Nobeyama were varying on a time scale of tens of minutes which might relate to brightenings seen in CDS data in transition region or chromospheric wavelengths. More data has been taken which will help to confirm this.
(Gopal, Del Zanna, Bromage)

2.Attempting to map the WIND observations back to the EUV observations of the ET hole. The aim is to map back to an image of the hole at the time that the fast wind seen by WIND might have originated. Mikic and Jon have already shown that the fast wind maps back to within their modelled coronal hole, based on magnetic field data from 26th August. However, we have still to match this to images (EIT.CDS) at around the correct time, which would have been a day or two earlier (?). During the workshop the question arose - why does the open field not appear to map back to the 'tip' of the Elephant's Trunk in the Mikic/Linker model? John Clegg will check if this is the case with his mag field modelling.
(Bromage, Thompson, Mikic, Linker, Clegg, Zhao, Hoeksema)

3. Compare intensity profiles/densities and temperatures within the hole taken by SUMER and CDS. Also relate to MDI data. This was during a period of high time resolution MDI/EIT observations. CDS has analysed this period. SUMER is still working on it. The EIT data has been looked at - there are one or two regions changing during this time. We have not looked at the MDI data yet.
(Hassler, Warren, Del Zanna, Bromage, Thompson, DeForest)

4.Comparison of CDS and Yohkoh temperature data. CDS try to do emission measure for MgIX? Use densities from SiIX to infer the volume. Maybe repeat for FeXIII? These will need to be done later - will take time. For now can compare Yohkoh temperatures with the MgX/MgIX ratio and perhaps the emission measure with the differential emission measure curve over that temperature range. Some of this work has transferred to group B. During the workshop an interesting cool feature was noted in the SXT data which will be investigated further.

5. Identify CIRs around the time of the ET hole. This topic I believe has transferred to group E (?).
(Breen, Posner, Galvin?)

6. Identify flow data in the ET hole. This was mostly to involve SUMER and possibly UVCS. This topic I believe also has transferred to group B.
(Warren, Strachan, Dobzycka)


Ensuing discussion generated one or two interesting topics:

What is a coronal hole? How do we define the boundaries? How does the structure of the ET relate to the associated prominence channels? How does this relate to the neutral line data produced by Pat Mackintosh? What does the 10830 data show us about the ET? Does the size (width) of the hole limit the speed of the fast wind emanating from it?

'Summary' Paper:

It was a little difficult to determine how much of the work on the ET hole should be covered by this paper. In the end an outline was generated, which hopefully covers the main points of interest. There was not really sufficient time to discuss this in detail so please continue to comment on/ complain about this!

The title : The Elephant's Trunk Coronal Hole

The paper should address the questions: